Goto

Collaborating Authors

 thermal comfort model


Enhancing personalised thermal comfort models with Active Learning for improved HVAC controls

Tekler, Zeynep Duygu, Lei, Yue, Dai, Xilei, Chong, Adrian

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Developing personalised thermal comfort models to inform occupant-centric controls (OCC) in buildings requires collecting large amounts of real-time occupant preference data. This process can be highly intrusive and labour-intensive for large-scale implementations, limiting the practicality of real-world OCC implementations. To address this issue, this study proposes a thermal preference-based HVAC control framework enhanced with Active Learning (AL) to address the data challenges related to real-world implementations of such OCC systems. The proposed AL approach proactively identifies the most informative thermal conditions for human annotation and iteratively updates a supervised thermal comfort model. The resulting model is subsequently used to predict the occupants' thermal preferences under different thermal conditions, which are integrated into the building's HVAC controls. The feasibility of our proposed AL-enabled OCC was demonstrated in an EnergyPlus simulation of a real-world testbed supplemented with the thermal preference data of 58 study occupants. The preliminary results indicated a significant reduction in overall labelling effort (i.e., 31.0%) between our AL-enabled OCC and conventional OCC while still achieving a slight increase in energy savings (i.e., 1.3%) and thermal satisfaction levels above 98%. This result demonstrates the potential for deploying such systems in future real-world implementations, enabling personalised comfort and energy-efficient building operations.

  Country:
  Genre: Research Report > New Finding (0.90)
  Industry: Construction & Engineering > HVAC (1.00)

Conditional Synthetic Data Generation for Personal Thermal Comfort Models

Das, Hari Prasanna, Spanos, Costas J.

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Personal thermal comfort models aim to predict an individual's thermal comfort response, instead of the average response of a large group. Recently, machine learning algorithms have proven to be having enormous potential as a candidate for personal thermal comfort models. But, often within the normal settings of a building, personal thermal comfort data obtained via experiments are heavily class-imbalanced. There are a disproportionately high number of data samples for the "Prefer No Change" class, as compared with the "Prefer Warmer" and "Prefer Cooler" classes. Machine learning algorithms trained on such class-imbalanced data perform sub-optimally when deployed in the real world. To develop robust machine learning-based applications using the above class-imbalanced data, as well as for privacy-preserving data sharing, we propose to implement a state-of-the-art conditional synthetic data generator to generate synthetic data corresponding to the low-frequency classes. Via experiments, we show that the synthetic data generated has a distribution that mimics the real data distribution. The proposed method can be extended for use by other smart building datasets/use-cases.


Balancing thermal comfort datasets: We GAN, but should we?

Quintana, Matias, Schiavon, Stefano, Tham, Kwok Wai, Miller, Clayton

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Thermal comfort assessment for the built environment has become more available to analysts and researchers due to the proliferation of sensors and subjective feedback methods. These data can be used for modeling comfort behavior to support design and operations towards energy efficiency and well-being. By nature, occupant subjective feedback is imbalanced as indoor conditions are designed for comfort, and responses indicating otherwise are less common. This situation creates a scenario for the machine learning workflow where class balancing as a pre-processing step might be valuable for developing predictive thermal comfort classification models with high-performance. This paper investigates the various thermal comfort dataset class balancing techniques from the literature and proposes a modified conditional Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), $\texttt{comfortGAN}$, to address this imbalance scenario. These approaches are applied to three publicly available datasets, ranging from 30 and 67 participants to a global collection of thermal comfort datasets, with 1,474; 2,067; and 66,397 data points, respectively. This work finds that a classification model trained on a balanced dataset, comprised of real and generated samples from $\texttt{comfortGAN}$, has higher performance (increase between 4% and 17% in classification accuracy) than other augmentation methods tested. However, when classes representing discomfort are merged and reduced to three, better imbalanced performance is expected, and the additional increase in performance by $\texttt{comfortGAN}$ shrinks to 1-2%. These results illustrate that class balancing for thermal comfort modeling is beneficial using advanced techniques such as GANs, but its value is diminished in certain scenarios. A discussion is provided to assist potential users in determining which scenarios this process is useful and which method works best.


Reinforcement Learning-based Thermal Comfort Control for Vehicle Cabins

Brusey, James, Hintea, Diana, Gaura, Elena, Beloe, Neil

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Vehicle climate control systems aim to keep passengers thermally comfortable. However, current systems control temperature rather than thermal comfort and tend to be energy hungry, which is of particular concern when considering electric vehicles. This paper poses energy-efficient vehicle comfort control as a Markov Decision Process, which is then solved numerically using Sarsa({\lambda}) and an empirically validated, single-zone, 1D thermal model of the cabin. The resulting controller was tested in simulation using 200 randomly selected scenarios and found to exceed the performance of bang-bang, proportional, simple fuzzy logic, and commercial controllers with 23%, 43%, 40%, 56% increase, respectively. Compared to the next best performing controller, energy consumption is reduced by 13% while the proportion of time spent thermally comfortable is increased by 23%. These results indicate that this is a viable approach that promises to translate into substantial comfort and energy improvements in the car.